In the context of the American Revolution, expressions of the right to revolution were seen as both a precondition and unconstrained by conditions. On the eve of the American Revolution, for example, Americans saw their fate as a justification for exercising the right to revolution. Alexander Hamilton justified American resistance as an expression of the “natural law” that eliminates violations of the “first principles of civil society” and interference in “the rights of an entire people.” [49] For Thomas Jefferson, the Declaration was the last desperate attempt by an oppressed people – the position in which many Americans found themselves in 1776. Jefferson`s litany of colonial grievances was an attempt to establish that Americans were fulfilling their burden of exercising the natural right to revolution. In his Political treatise, Aristotle disapproves of the provision of the Cretan Constitution for the aristocratic right to revolutionize against the Cosmi, the ten most important judges in the country: “The worst is the suspension of the office of Cosmi, a means to which nobles often resort when they do not submit to justice.” For Aristotle, this is evidence of codified oligarchic interference in a supposedly constitutional republican government. [47] Contrary to this view, the Frenchman scout Montesquieu believed that this institution had succeeded in preventing abuses of power, thanks to the existing premise of a powerful patriotism that the Cretans felt towards their island. [48] Although many declarations of independence seek legitimacy by invoking the right to revolution, far fewer constitutions mention this right or guarantee this right to citizens because of the destabilizing effect such a guarantee is likely to have. Here are examples of articulating a revolutionary law as a positive law: Simply put, “an insurrection, whatever its immediate cause, ends up endangering the entire government.” Hamilton pointed out, however, that the vast geography of the United States meant that a federal army could not restrict the right to revolution at all, because: “If the federal army were to be able to suppress the resistance of a state, distant states would have the power to make heads with new forces. [27] Provokes new legal philosophical debates on the rule of change Perhaps no other great philosopher has written as much about the right to revolution as the Enlightenment philosopher John Locke.
He developed the concept in his Two Treatises on Government, particularly in the last two chapters “On Tyranny” and “On the Dissolution of Government.” Rights were an important part of his theory of the social contract, in which he defined the foundations of social relations. Locke stated that under natural law, all people have the right to life, liberty, and private property; Under the social contract, the people could start a revolution against the government if it acted against the interests of the citizens in order to replace the government with a government that served the interests of the citizens. In some cases, Locke saw revolution as an obligation. For him, the right to revolution served as protection against tyranny. As Pauline Maier noted in her study From Resistance to Revolution, “individuals were prohibited from using violence against their leaders, whether out of malice or because of private injury.” [31] Instead, “not only a few individuals, but the `body of the people` must have felt concerned” before the right to revolution was justified and most authors speak of an “entire people acting in its `public authority`, indicating a broad consensus involving all strata of society.” [32] Online translation of the English legal term revolution in Spanish: revolución (English-Spanish translation). Learn more about the Legal Dictionary from English to Spanish online. end of the 14th century, at the origin of celestial bodies, from the old French revolucion “course, revolution (of celestial bodies)” (13c.), or directly from the late Latin revolutionem (nominative revolutio) “a revolving “, name of the action of the radical past participle of the Latin revolvere “to turn, to retreat” (see turn). The general feeling of “great changes in business” is recorded from the middle of the 15th century. The political meaning “overthrow of an established political system” was first recorded around 1600, derived from French, and was particularly applied to the expulsion of the Stuart dynasty under James II in 1688 and the transfer of sovereignty to William and Mary.
